Skip to main content

Ontario High Speed Rail Could Arrive Faster

Guest Post by Terry Johnson, Southwestern Ontario Transportation Alliance

Ontario is moving forward with its much-needed project to halve journey times across Southwestern Ontario by bringing 250 km/h High Speed Rail to London and Windsor. However, the government has published a timetable suggesting that the earliest dates for implementation could be 2025 and 2031 respectively. This timetable appears to have more than doubled since the original announcement in London just before the 2014 election.

Ontario needs to work to a more ambitious timetable that delivers meaningful improvements in travel times much sooner, and for more communities.

 While 2031 doesn’t sound quite as futuristic as it once did, a few things will have happened by then. There will have been two full economic cycles and four elections, any one of which could derail the project. Fifteen more cohorts of students will have passed through our universities. Computers will be more than fifty times faster than today. Many countries will have ended or be close to ending gasoline car sales, and self-driving technology will be commonplace.

 More practically, the entire VIA Rail passenger fleet that Southwestern Ontario services depend upon today simply isn’t going to last that long. The trains that bring today’s students and researchers to study artificial intelligence at Waterloo or the inner workings of the human brain at Western are already as much as 70 years old, and there are only so many miracles that can be worked to keep legacy equipment fit for daily 160 km/h service. Safety always comes first, so if equipment wears out before replacements arrive then services will be cut.

 If the objective of the project is to support the emerging innovation corridor in our region, action is already well overdue and what’s needed is an agile, incremental approach that delivers results at every step. This also happens to be the approach that’s worked for other rail networks around the world, and it costs less overall because farebox revenues flow sooner.

Step one would be for Ontario to sit down with the federal government and green light the passenger rail fleet replacement that is already being studied by the federal Liberals. By ordering a modern fleet of 250 km/h trains that meets the future needs of the whole corridor from Quebec City to Windsor, we’ll avoid the long-term maintenance cost problems that plague small fleets; be ready to use each upgraded or new section of track as it is ready; end the lawsuits over the shortage of wheelchair spaces on obsolete equipment; and overcome the equipment shortage that is holding back VIA Rail’s previously promised service expansion in our region. If an order is placed soon, the first of the new trains could be on the rails by 2020.

Step two would be to make the best of the existing infrastructure, acknowledging that a new high-speed alignment between London and Kitchener will take a while to build. The Toronto-Kitchener-London route can already support six daily services thanks to previous investment in signalling and passing sidings that are currently underutilized, so services could be reinstated in months, not years. Combined with services via Woodstock, an hourly service to London is within reach. The route between London and Chatham that is included in the Ontario HSR plan could also be restored to double track within a year, with all grade crossings fully protected. This would eliminate delays, allow more frequent services, improve safety, and reduce travel times by as much as thirty minutes.

Step three would be to ensure tight integration with London’s Bus Rapid Transit and other regional rail and transit services from the outset, so that passengers can transfer easily and quickly. It costs a lot less to shave fifteen minutes off end-to-end travel time by designing better stations and coordinating service connections than by increasing top speed, and for the project to serve the interests of the whole region, connecting buses and regional rail services must be treated as integral parts of the project.

With these simple steps, many of the benefits of the Ontario HSR project could be delivered as much as ten years sooner, without duplicating work or adding to the overall cost, while improving the chances of getting the full project delivered on schedule.

 For information visit SWOTA website at -  About the Southwestern Ontario Transportation Alliance: SWOTA is a coalition of local transport advocacy groups and likeminded individuals. Our mission is to connect community groups, government stakeholders, and businesses working towards the integration and enhancement of rail, bus, and local transit services across Southwestern Ontario; and to work toward the creation of a regional transportation agency for Southwestern Ontario.


  1. HSR will never be built because Ontario does not have the population density to support it and HSR is way too expensive. In a 2012 report the California High Speed Rail Authority put the annual maintenance cost at $200,000 US per mile per year. British estimates are $430,000 and European ones are closer to those of California.

    What is needed is a higher speed higher performance service with modern equipment, not a ago boosting line that will bleed all the funds from real service and end up killing all other rail and bus service.

    Robert Wightman
    President, Transport Action Ontario

  2. California is building a 350 km/h hsr project, which has significantly higher construction and maintenance costs. The Ontario project under consideration isn't a true hsr project like the TGV, but it's an appropriate level of investment considering the sizes of cities and distances involved.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Canada-USA High Speed Possibilities - Part 1 Montreal-Boston

High Speed Rail Canada - High Noon for High Speed Rail Series Canada-USA High Speed Possibilities - Part 1 Montreal-Boston Paul Langan, Founder High Speed Rail Canada - 11/11/09 The High Speed Rail (HSR) passenger rail renewal is coming to North America the question is where will it be implemented.I would like to examine the cross border opportunities for HSR that have been put forward. Four possible passenger rail corridors connecting Canada and the USA exist. They are; Vancouver BC to Seattle WA , Windsor ON to Detroit MI , Montreal QC - New York NY and Montreal QC-Boston MA. I would like to examine the Montreal-Boston HSR proposal first. All these cross border corridors share three significant fundamental challenges. 1. A multitude of political stakeholders - The more governments that are involved the process the slower the ability to get change to occur. This is especially true between Canada and the USA where dialogue and cooperation on passenger ra

VIA Rail Canada Fights to Keep Public from Seeing their Flawed $4 Billion High Frequency Rail Business Plan

Empty Trains - VIA Rail Montreal to Quebec City - 2019 Why is VIA Rail hiding their high frequency business case and plans from the public? When VIA Rail first announced their $4 billion plan to run trains over a half-a-century-old abandoned rail line from Toronto through to Quebec City, many were shocked. What business case could VIA possibly make to the taxpayers and to the federal government?  The facts did not support reality. The simple truth is: If VIA’s high frequency rail plan was approved, it would result in trains running at speeds from the 1970s, and the trip times between Toronto and Montreal would be at least 30minutes longer than in 1970. The slow juggernaut of getting in and out of Toronto and Montreal and travelling on a remote rail line, with numerous dangerous level crossings, was hardly the answer to the problems facing VIA Rail. Former VIA Rail President, Yves Desjardins-Siciliano gave numerous diatribes in Ontario and Quebec against the idea of real high-speed rail

VIA RAIL $5.25 Billion "Milk Run" Rail Line to Stop in Sharbot Lake!

Passenger Rail Service Returns to Sharbot Lake. Are You Ready Campers? We have done stories previously on VIA Rail fundamentally flawed plan to run slow trains from Toronto - Tweed - Peterborough to Ottawa.  Now comes news that the VIA Rail will be stopping at Sharbot Lake. Good news for campers without tents! Please read our previous story on VIA Rail and Sharbot Lake. Here are a couple fun facts about VIA Rail. 1. VIA Rail High Frequency Rail Plan is More Dangerous than true High Speed Rail . VIA Rail plan is not grade separated. Their plan has trains on the same grade level as autos. Having VIA Rail  tracks at level crossings with roads increases the chances of an auto/train collision. In high speed rail, trains and autos are grade separated eliminating the chance of an accident occurring. That is why the high speed rail system in Japan has never had a fatality after over a half of century of operation. The safety of Canadians traveling by rail should be paramount im